Thursday, October 7, 2021

12 angry men analysis essay

12 angry men analysis essay

12 angry men analysis essay

 · Tyler Streets. Dr. Lipson. Organizational Behavior 01 November “12 Angry Men” Analysis. By the sound of it, you would think “12 Angry Men” would be a football game, but a lot can be said for a jury proceeding and this movie does a great job of showing that. Twelve different men with twelve different personalities are locked in a room until they can Essays on 12 Angry Men. Twelve Angry Men is a courtroom movie about twelve jurors who have to deliberate on a case involving a teenager accused of stabbing his father to death. If convicted, the boy will be sentenced to death. The twelve jurors have to put their personal conflicts aside to reach the verdict Twelve Angry Men: Summary & Analysis. The movie Twelve Angry Men begins with an eighteen-year-old boy from the ghetto who is on trial for the murder of his abusive father. A jury of twelve men is locked in the deliberation room to decide the fate of the young boy. All evidence is against the boy and a guilty verdict would send him to die in the electric chair



12 Angry Men Analysis Essay



The action revolves around the opinions, perceptions, reason and logic of twelve diverse characters that are tasked with pronouncing the guilt or innocence of a young man accused of patricide. The extraordinary element is that their finding will determine his life or death. This play was made into a movie inproduced by Henry Fonda who played the lead role and Reginald Rose who wrote the original screenplay.


This essay will explore some of the elements of Critical thinking found within the context of this remarkable movie, and will show that rational reason and logic when used effectively can overcome the mostly ineffective rush to judgement that can be prevalent in a population.


Within the movie, it can be seen that persuasive argument is employed by one single juror to help sway the majority to believe his analysis of the evidence presented, He sets on a course to reach out to each juror and improve their thinking by reasonable and justified persuasion, Chaffee tells us that we can improve our thinking in an organised and systematic way by Carefully examining our thinking process and the thinking 12 angry men analysis essay of others By focusing our attention on various thinking approaches and strategies, we can learn to think more effectively Practicing our thinking abilities.


To improve our thinking, we actually have to think for ourselves, to explore and make sense of thinking situations by using our thinking abilities. Although it is important to 12 angry men analysis essay about thinking and learn how other people think, there is no substitute for actually doing it ourselves.


Chaffee p47 The movie has a simple premise, that a minority may affect a majority if rational thought and logic are used to construct arguments based on sound reasons and that when this is applied to lalse 12 angry men analysis essay or fallacies that these can be changed. There were three points raised in the trial that Juror 8 believed required argument analysis, 1.


The knife that was the murder weapon was unique and the boy was seen with it, although he said he had lost it. That the old lady saw the boy kill his father through her window, whilst a train was passing. Juror 8 analyses each of these points and makes credible arguments that the conclusion is flawed based on incorrect reasoning, by pointing out inconsistencies in the conclusions reached.


The other jurors are content to believe that their reasoning is solid, as they have used examples of deductive reasoning to reach their conclusion. Chaffee tells about deductive reasoning. The deductive argument is the one most commonly associated with the study of logic. Though it has a variety of valid forms, they all share one characteristic: If you accept the supporting reasons also called premises as true, then you must necessarily accept the conclusion as true. Chaffee p During the course of the debate within the jury room Juror 8 summarises the evidence presented 12 angry men analysis essay the conclusions drawn by his fellow jurors, by asking questions like, what do we know about that?


Or what does this show? He analyses the content, by breaking down the component parts and analysing each point through examination of what has been presented. He then synthesises the content by pulling together what he had summarized, and analysed and discusses it with the input of the other jurors.


Finally he reaches an evaluation, and presents this to his peers on the jury as a reasonable version of events, 12 angry men analysis essay. This process as described in Troyka, Hesse of Sumarise, analyse, 12 angry men analysis essay, synthesise and evaluate, marks juror 8 out from the rest of the jury as the most effective critical thinker as he engages in this process throughout the movie.


The antithesis to Juror 8 may be Juror 3 as portrayed by Lee J. We get the impression that he has made his mind up and has settled on a verdict of guilty to satisfy some personal feelings. He is shown to be morally conflicted. The question of morals and ethics also run a current theme through the movie. The sketching of the characters lead the audience to decide who is morally conflicted or not. Within the characters there are overt moral and ethical issues raised. The subject of the movie is essentially a moral or ethical question, it asks us the audience, what would you do?


Asking us to invoke our values and assumptions, and find the truth amongst the evidence presented. The movie gives us various characters of differing levels in society all bound together for one purpose, to find the truth in the evidence given which may result in a death sentence for the accused. The varying personalities and degrees of moral fortitude is evident from their reactions.


Another ethical issue is the use of persuasion by juror 8 who seems intent on turning the jury to find with him, 12 angry men analysis essay, he uses methods that may be ethically unsound to sway other easily pliable members of the jury his way to gain momentum to use against his most fervent foes on the panel.


The burden of proof is the most difficult in law it is beyond a reasonable doubt, and Juror 8 who through reason and logic, who sees through the fallacies and falsehoods created by those in the room, who sows the seeds of doubt through the analysis and synthesis of the evidence provided, 12 angry men analysis essay, leads the group to a single conclusion.


We as an audience are also left with 12 angry men analysis essay narrative as was unfolded, and it is down to us whether we believe that the truth was uncovered or whether it was just a matter of objective persuasion and therefore whether the ends justify the means. Critical Analysis of Twelve Angry Men Movie, 12 angry men analysis essay.


Accessed October 7, Critical Analysis of Twelve Angry Men Movie Categories: Critical Thinking Epistemology Ethics Jury Movie Reason. Download paper. Analysis, Pages 7 words. Turn in your highest-quality paper Get a qualified writer to help you with. Get to Know The Price Estimate For Your Paper. Deadline: 10 days left. Number of pages. Email Invalid email. Get quality help now.


Verified writer. Proficient in: Critical Thinking. Cite this page Critical Analysis of Twelve Angry Men Movie. Related Essays. Stay Safe, Stay Original. Not Finding What You Need? Copying content is not allowed on this website. ASK writer FOR HELP. Give us your email and we'll send you the essay you need. Send me the sample. By clicking Send Me The Sample you agree to the terms and conditions of our service.


We'll not send you spam or irrelevant messages. Please indicate where to send you the sample, 12 angry men analysis essay. Your sample has been sent. Don't waste time. Let our experts help you. Hire verified expert. com uses cookies. By continuing you agree to our cookie policy.


Get Your Job Done By a Professional Skilled Expert. HIRE Writer. Money Back Guarantee.




Character Analysis for 12 Angry Men (1957)

, time: 11:30





12 Angry Men Conflict Analysis Essay » Homework Essay Writings


12 angry men analysis essay

Twelve Angry Men: Summary & Analysis. The movie Twelve Angry Men begins with an eighteen-year-old boy from the ghetto who is on trial for the murder of his abusive father. A jury of twelve men is locked in the deliberation room to decide the fate of the young boy. All evidence is against the boy and a guilty verdict would send him to die in the electric chair Essays on 12 Angry Men. Twelve Angry Men is a courtroom movie about twelve jurors who have to deliberate on a case involving a teenager accused of stabbing his father to death. If convicted, the boy will be sentenced to death. The twelve jurors have to put their personal conflicts aside to reach the verdict  · Words 4 Pages. 12 Angry Men Essay. 12 Angry Men is a movie which can teach anyone about the way a group works together and how leaderships styles can prevail. In this movie we are shown both good and bad leadership styles. “ 12 Angry Men ” is a tale about a jury’s debate regarding a capital murder case

No comments:

Post a Comment